EDITORIAL OPINION : "First Lady On An Illegal Podium - The Guardian Editorial - 23rd June, 2013"
Patience
Jonathan, the First Lady and Permanent Secretary in the Bayelsa State
Civil Service, a position to which she was promoted last year to
national outrage, is in the news again for the wrong reasons.
Having decided to now conduct her public outings with an official podium
of 'First Lady' complete with the country's coat of arms and national
colours, it seems there is no limit to the odium Nigeria would endure in
her hands. For the
wife of the President, occupying a ceremonial
office that is unknown to Nigeria's constitution and laws, to use the
coat of arms in the manner she does amounts to a desecration of national
symbols and disrespect to all Nigerians.
This odious practice
should be stopped immediately and President Goodluck Jonathan should
lead the way as the man who has sworn to abide by the constitution and
uphold its tenets. It is bad enough that the First Lady's deviation from
the norm is manifesting in the President's household, it is
doubly
sad that he has seen nothing wrong with it. No doubt, Madam Jonathan
deserves praise for her tireless efforts at improving the lots of
Nigerian women. Her campaigns on the political scene did more a lot to
impact on her husband's political fortunes. She is indeed a force for
good. But introducing a seal of her own is a little over border.
It all seemed a joke when, in February, Patience Jonathan, surrounded
by her friends and family members, first made her address on a
customized podium adorned with the country's official seal. From all
indications, the practice
appears to be her new fancy,
disrespectful as it is of the country's sovereignty and cherished
ideals. Naturally, the question that has necessarily been provoked is:
on what basis could the 'office' of the First Lady, unrecognised by the
constitution, carry a seal bearing the nation's coat of arms and the national colours?
This is a joke taken too far and a clear violation of the constitution
of Nigeria. It is surprising that this indiscretion escaped the
attention and advice of the civil servants or, perhaps, worse still,
enjoyed their approval.
Whatever the case, this saga is a
clear demonstration of how much erosion dignity and professionalism have
suffered in the nation's civil service. Besides, if those who are
expected to guide the first wife on the unconstitutionality of her
actions failed in their duty, can the President himself claim ignorance
of his spouse's debauchment?
Notably, this is not the first
time Madam Jonathan would be involved in conducts unbecoming of her
station as the President's consort. Her several goofs in public are now
well documented in an unedifying diary of her person and
position.
She often behaves like an all-conquering empress as she takes on
governors and elected leaders at the slightest opportunity in ways that
embarrass the nation.
Sometime in the middle of last year, the Governor of
Bayelsa State Seriake Dickson elevated the First Lady to the rank of
permanent secretary without a portfolio in the civil service of Bayelsa
State, ostensibly in accordance with the constitutional power conferred
on him but certainly in
total disregard of decency.
On her
part, the beneficiary justified her promotion on the point that she had
been a teacher in the state, when in reality, she had been away from
her job since her husband was elected Deputy Governor of Bayelsa State,
and up to his
ascension of office as the President of the Federal
Republic of Nigeria. On another occasion, she sent the Minister of Water
Resources, Mrs. Serah Ochekpe, to represent her at a book launch in
honour of President Olusegun Obasanjo at
the latter's Presidential Library in Abeokuta.
These episodes bring to the front burner issues of law and ethics in
governance, and they constitute avoidable pressures on the polity. The
First Lady has no power to commandeer a serving minister to do her
bidding. A minister is a servant of the state, appointed by the
President, not his wife. That action was a clear violation of sections
147 and 148 of the 1999 Constitution which vests in the President the
power to appoint a minister who may be assigned a
'responsibility
for any business of the Government of the Federation, including the
administration of any department of government.' Surely the First Lady's
office does not fall into the category stipulated by the constitution.
Patience Jonathan's actions are not only too brazen but clearly
unconstitutional, an act for which the President could be held
accountable. The time has, therefore, come to remind Mr Jonathan that
Madam Jonathan has stepped
out of bounds, this time adorning her
ceremonial station with the seal of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, and
she must be reined in immediately.
Her action ridicules
Nigeria in the comity of nations and President Jonathan needs to
demonstrate that he understands the implication of the leadership
position he occupies and back it up with corresponding action.
Truly, Nigeria has been unlucky to have many leaders seemingly incapable
of appreciating basic ethics of governance even when they are ever so
quick to cite
precedents for their actions from countries like the United States of America. This, however, is often done dishonestly.
The 'First Lady' has no place in the constitution and clearly is a ceremonial position from which the lucky spouse is
expected to use her personal comportment to enhance her husband's
image. In America where it evolved in the nineteen century, it was
manifestly for delivering some public good, especially those involving
charity and humanitarian exertion. First Ladies in America never seek to
interfere with the President's job, never dare attempt to usurp the
powers of their husbands, let alone drag them to the dangerous grounds
of infringement of the basic laws of the country and the consequent
threat of impeachment.
In Nigeria, the impunity now being
displayed by those saddled with the responsibility of running the
nation's affairs has rendered the country a fertile ground for breeding
the improbable. The Patience Jonathan First Ladyship, in its power grab,
is one such absurdity.
First Lady's status is a moral pulpit
from which the highest of values cherished by a nation are expected to
be espoused, especially by example. It is no podium for unconstitutional
actions, substantive or symbolic.
No comments:
Post a Comment