THE Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) is currently
engulfed in controversy over a 38-year old single-hull oil vessel, which
has gulped about N10.9 billion in maintenance and set to be disposed
for N10.5 million, as its viability is being questioned due to new
International Maritime Organisation (IMO) regulation outlawing
single-hull vessels as oil tankers from 2015.
Investigations by the Nigerian Tribune revealed that the oil vessel
in question, MT TUMA, was built in 1975 and bought for N543 million in
1985 by NNPC.
Gibocol, a Dutch firm financed the vessel on behalf of the NNPC
during the administration of Professor Tam David-West as Petroleum
Minister.
It was taken to Setubal, Portugal for repair works in 1985. The repair gulped about N775 million.
However, on completion of repair works, the vessel was brought to
Bonny water to be used as a storage facility for surplus Automotive Gas
Oil (AGO) because Nigeria was producing surplus AGO but there was no
export market for the commodity, with MT TUMA collecting excess AGO
produced at the refinery.
Meanwhile, MT TUMA stayed on Nigerian waters until the production of
diesel started to go down. When there was no diesel coming from the
refinery, MT TUMA allegedly became an idle vessel, virtually doing
nothing, starting from late 90s.
MT TUMA was later anchored offshore Lagos and was allegedly turned
into an office/hotel by the Petroleum Products Marketing Companies
(PPMC) coordinator of the vessel.
The MT TUMA coordinator was the one in charge of arranging vessel
trans-shipment and lightening operations. Instead of the radio being in
the office, the MT TUMA coordinator allegedly went onboard with full
complement of expatriate officers and Nigerian crew.
NNPC was reportedly sustaining the full crew on board MT TUMA with
the ship virtually doing nothing. Analysis of feeding an individual on
board an international vessel revealed that it would take about N1,550
equivalent of $10 per day to feed an individual.
On board the MT TUMA were allegedly 26 people with NNPC allegedly
spending N3 million daily to feed the whole crew on board the vessel.
During the Olusegun Obasanjo administration, moves were made to get
approval from the government for the vessel to be dry-docked, which
would cost the government more funds. The ex-President approved the
dry-docking on May 24, 2007, five days before leaving office.
It was meant to be a routine dry docking which was to last three
months, but was abandoned for almost six years, while it cost the nation
about N10.9 billion.
The contract, which was for the general engineering repairs and
overhauling, including pre-voyage works/certification, was expected due
for completion within 12 months, from December 16, 2007, for the vessel
to return to Nigeria.
Two other contracts for “manning and management,” as well as
consultancy went to Messrs Royal Marine and Spares Limited and Messrs
Mare Maritime Limited respectively.
However, the contractor allegedly missed the deadline, following
several breaches in the contract terms, a development that resulted in
the vessel’s loss of its classification.
In spite of the reported failure of the Brazilian firms to deliver on
the contract, successive managements at the NNPC allegedly continued
pumping more money in hard currency, running into several billions of
dollars, to service the contract to keep the engine of the vessel
running throughout the five years it anchored in the dockyard in Brazil.
At a point, it was gathered that the vessel could only be towed as it
junketed from one dockyard to another, as the engine parts were
reportedly dismembered, rendering it incapable of sailing on its own.
In April 2009, the House of Representatives Committee on Public
Procurement carried out a probe into suspected irregularities in the
award of the contract, following reports that the NNPC did not follow
due process as spelt out in the provisions of the Public Procurement
Act.
The lawmakers, who were also concerned about NNPC’s lack of requisite
capacity to manage a vessel the size of MT TUMA, recommended in their
report its immediate sale whenever it returned to Nigeria.
The vessel found its way back into the country in May 2012 without the maintenance job being allegedly done properly.
A brand new MT TUMA will cost N6.2 billion now, but the vessel
dry-docking process in Brazil by the NNPC gulped about N10.9 billion.
Leaked information revealed that the corporation had put a price-tag of N10.5 million on the vessel.
Responding to enquiries on phone, the General Manager, Public Affairs
of the NNPC, Dr Farouk Umar, said “MT TUMA is a long story dating back
to many NNPC administrations before the current administration. To get
detailed information, we will need to get the relevant files of those
NNPC administrations that were involved one way or the other in the
past. MT TUMA has preceded so many NNPC administrations.”
Built in 1975, MT TUMA, which is about 280 by 41 metres in size, with
deadweight capacity of 136,100 tonnes, is one of Nigeria’s main crude
oil storage tankers with IMO tag 7388700, acquired by the government to
facilitate the transportation of crude oil within and outside the
country.
The vessel, which was first dry-docked in 1998, was due for another
dry dock repairs in 2003. However, due to some bureaucratic delays, the
repairs were delayed till June 21, 2006 when the vessel, which was laden
with petroleum products, suffered extensive damage when its engine room
exploded during its berth at the Beachland Estate, Ibafon, Apapa, and
Lagos.
The explosion was reportedly as a result of a massive leakage of
petroleum products, which flooded the engine room for several days.
Senior Special Assistant to the President on Maritime, Mr Leke
Oyewole, hovever ,said he his not aware of the existence of MT TUMA.
“I do not have details about that vessel, but if those statistics are
correct, it is a disaster that we have spent so much money and we will
scrap it for such a little, but in the interim, until 2015, if we use
the vessel the way we are supposed to use it, we would have also recover
large sums of money,”he said.
No comments:
Post a Comment