The tests, The Nation learnt,
were conducted last November for 42 students, who were asked to go for
“routine tests”.. After resumption this year, some of them were told
that they “tested positive” and last Friday, some of those who “tested
positive” got expulsion letters; others got theirs on Monday.
Some of the affected students told The Nation
that the University authority never told them the purpose of the test
and did not show them the results. They also claim that they were not
given a fair hearing.
“I only saw in
the expulsion letter that I tested positive to hard drugs. I asked for
the result of the test, but they didn’t show me. Even if they won’t show
it to me, they should at least show my parents the result,” a student said.
“They should have at least set up a panel of enquiry and if the panel finds us guilty, so be it,” another student said.
The Director of Corporate Affairs, Adetunji Adeleye,
however defended the institution’s decision saying it was was taken in
line with the school’s religous norms and philosophy “to raise godly
children”.
“A student was
caught with an illicit drug. He mentioned others involved and we took
them to the school clinic for tests. Some of them tested positive. There
is no need to show the students the results because the university
cannot conspire against them.
“Nobody should
think anybody hates those students. It’s not spurious. In fact, it is
even painful for us because we are losing revenue by sending them away.
But it’s a painful decision we must take in our quest to raise students
that will transform the world. The expelled students are those that
refused the university’s lifeline of a second chance.
“We wanted to
help them. The university has a programme designed to help them live a
normal life, but they rejected the offer. A few of them accepted and
they are undergoing the programme,” The Nation quoted him as saying.
When asked why the students were not
handed over to the narcotics agency since their offence was a criminal
act, Adeleye said the school was neither the police nor the narcotics
agency and had no reason to do so. The report also said he was evasive
when asked if the institution’s clinic was capable of testing urine
samples for hard drugs.
He however added that the Vice-Chancellor was considering a review of the matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment