Ahmed Salkida, the popular journalist
who is the only one who has successfully and consistently been able to
get in touch with the leadership of the Jamā'a Ahl al-sunnah li-da'wa wa
al-jihād, better known as Boko Haram, has revealed that if the violent
Islamic sect knows the whereabouts of Major General Muhammadu Buhari
(rtd) they would kill him.
In an interview with online journalist,
Mercy Abang, Salkida was asked a question about Buhari's relationship
with the sect when he made the startling revelation. The question and
his response appear below;
Q: You once said the way out of the
conflict is for a trusted and independent body to ferry moderate clerics
to a third friendly country with the leadership of Boko Haram… Are you
speaking the mind of the sect? Because they (Boko Haram) had requested
former head of state Muhammadu Buhari, to lead the peace deal to hold in
Saudi Arabia?
A: First of all, the sect never said
Buhari should be a mediator or mentioned going to Saudi. It is the same
Abdulaziz group that declared ceasefire that made the pronouncement on
Buhari and co. When they called me to dispatch this same message to the
media, I asked the caller several questions about who he was and why
haven’t the sect reached me through the usual source. He could not give
me answers so he called ignorant journalists that spread his message
like wild fire. I am sorry to say this, if the sect knows where to find
General Buhari (someone I respect a lot) they will make an attempt on
his life. To them, any retired and servicing soldier, police, politician
or civil servant is an infidel that deserves to be killed. So how can
the same sect with such an ideology listen to General Buhari, the
Governor of Borno state or any other politician or the Sultan? The
average member of this sect see all these people whether they are
muslims or not as ‘livil corpses’. For God sake have we not been
listening to this people in the last couple of years?. Am I the only one
listening to them? It seems the sect have been more consistent with
their message than the Federal and state governments involve in this
conflict.
Your second question about going to a
third friendly nation to have an ideological debate with the sect. For
me, I will always maintain that since this is a problem of doctrine then
it must be tackled through a coherent, profound counter doctrine. There
has not been any concrete ideological intervention by the appropriate
authorities only military intervention. If the sect members say the
Qur’an allows them to kill Christians and fellow muslim security agents,
politicians, teachers, vaccinators and opposing clerics. I think it is
wise for Muslims that disagree with them to understand their arguments
clearly and bring a superior one to counter it, and I don’t think you
can hold such a debate before the eyes of the JTF. It can best be done
with the assurances of a third friendly nation whom the sect can trust
and the clerics of this nation may serve along side other international
clerics as arbiters. I think such an informal dialogue will not only
make us understand the reasons of this conflict but what is feeding it
and it will provide us with the best possible way to approach dialogue
or amnesty.
No comments:
Post a Comment